The Real World


Technology - the application of knowledge discovered through the pursuit of Scientific investigation has enabled us to invent many wonderful things.


We can have a video chat on our computers with our family across the world, watch 500 different satellite TV channels, generate three dimensional objects in plastic using a gadget like a printer, visit a station in space, incubate premature babies, restore vision to the blind and hearing to the deaf. If men from the middle ages could be transported into today they would think these things are ‘miracles’!


How many wonderful products has religion given us?


Do you want me to tell you?



Not a single one!


No tangible benefits at all!


Religions just give us different sects to belong to and argue with until a war starts.


Do we really

need Goblins,

Ghouls and

Gods in the

21st Century?

Dragons  have

been already

consigned to




Trust in Science

- it really works!




Well, please send your list of products developed by religions to:  email



Of course, the power that Scientific knowledge grants us can be used for bad purposes as well as good.

There are hardly any products or gadgets that are exclusively beneficial. For example, the development of a life saving

vaccine requires the culturing of disease organisms

which could be used as a weapon by ill-intentioned

people. Even the apparently innocent cement, which

is used to build spires and arches such as those on

Gaudi’s La Sagrada Familia (pictured), can also be

used to build an intercontinental ballistic missile silo.

Give me a pot of honey and I can make a bomb!


But Scientists cannot be held responsible for all

the ways the information they discover is applied. How something is used is the choice of the user, not the inventor. Even early man, who may have possessed nothing more sophisticated than a stick, was able to decide for himself whether he used it to till the soil and sow seeds or to bash someone over the head. Uses are often determined by politicians or individuals like terrorists; those are the people you should complain to about bad uses of technology. Personally, on principle, I wouldn’t become a soldier or work in an armaments factory; you must make up your own mind where you stand.


Alfred Nobel, inventor of dynamite, felt so guilty about the way he was described as ‘The Agent of Death’ in his mistakenly premature obituary (it was his brother who had actually died!) that he left funds in his will for prizes for those who confer the ‘greatest benefit to mankind’.                                    See:  Wikipedia


Similar  thinking has resulted in some fields of research, which could lead in dangerous directions for society, not being pursued.             

See? Scientists have good intentions!


Alfred Nobel (1833 - 1896)


Alfred succeeded in devising safe processes for the use of nitroglycerine which had an unpredictable behaviour and had caused many deaths.


He ‘tamed’ it into two products, dynamite and gelignite, which greatly improved mining.


He left a legacy for the Nobel Prizes

<<< Back

Next >>>

To: Scientists Disagree Next >>>

<<< Back







The Lenox Globe


Click here for worksheet on this page

Click to go to page: 1 2 2a 3 3a 3b 4 5 5a 6 6a 7 8 8a 8b 8c 8ca 8cb 8d 8e 9 9a 10

11 11a 11b 11c 12 12a 13 13a 13b 14 15 16 17 18 19 19a 20 21 22 23 23a 24